OUR COURTS USED AS A WEAPON

POLITICAL CONFORMITY OR PRISON TIME

AUSTRALIAN COURTS USED AS A WEAPON

Not only are these statements untrue, but any person in Australia who holds opinions which fall outside the ‘acceptable zone’ of mainstream groupthink, is ruthlessly punished by our government, harassed by the media and expelled from academia. The cultural elite of all western nations absolutely will not tolerate diversity of opinion, despite their mission statement.  Diversity is your strength goyim, but you can’t be diverse, or else.

EUROPEAN COURTS WEAPONISED

     USING COURTS AS A WEAPON IS NOT CONFINED TO AUSTRALIA

Former world powers in Europe are now a laughing stock due to insane Marxist policies designed to undermine their strength and unity. Almost all adult men living in our nation are fully aware that these polices can only lead to destruction. Very few speak out  because they know the penalty for doing so. In the UK serious crimes are being ignored because police are investigating homophobic tweets.

In London there’s whole areas where not a single burglary has been solved for the entire fiscal year, yet hundreds are arrested for offensive internet posts.

England leads the world when it comes to political correctness gone mad. People are often prosecuted for ‘grossly offensive’ messages, while there are no set rules for defining what’s offensive. 

VIOLENCE BY BLACKS IS IGNORED

ENGLISH COURTS WEAPONISED AGAINST THE BRITISH

WHITES JAILED FOR VANDALISM

A man who put bacon on a Mosque, which hurt nobody, gets 15 years jail. 15 years!  Think about it. What’s the difference between the two crimes you ask?

The second man was white.

THE USA IS NO DIFFERENT

In America dangerous, violent black criminals are being released with no bail while white people convicted of misdemeanors get years of jail time. There’s hundreds of cold blooded murders of white children by black criminals being tossed out by the courts every year.

Did you see the story about the white baby shot in the face point blank by black criminals in Georgia? The white child kidnapped, burned to death with a blowtorch by a black woman for a thrill?

Why did you not know about these events? The Jewish media conceal them from us to hasten our demise. Almost every racially motivated murder carried out in the US is black on white. But they would have you believe the opposite. In the next story they tell us a young boy ‘plunged from a balcony’. The boy was a white child, picked at random and thrown off a balcony by a black man, attempting to kill him.

Why did you not know about these events? The Jewish media conceal them from us to hasten our demise. Almost every racially motivated murder carried out in the US is black on white. But they would have you believe the opposite. 

Look at the reporting Americas media did about the white child picked at random and thrown from the balcony of a mall by a black man. The story says he ‘plunged’.

OVERSEAS COURTS MIGHT DISCRIMINATE, BUT

AUSTRALIAN COURTS ACTIVELY HUNT WHITE MEN

AUSTRALIAN COURTS ACTIVELY HUNT WHITE MEN

This happens here in Australia more than you know. Our courts single most important objective is to bankrupt, imprison and demoralize white men. The corrupt cabal of Jewish judges we have running our legal system don’t just wait for us to be brought to them. They actively engage with police behind the scenes to dictate who gets the most attention. When a target is brought in, this is when he learns that white men have zero legal rights. It doesn’t matter how absurd the accusation, or how strong your defence. The result is inevitable. You will lose.

This may sound far-fetched to those without experience in our courts, but any white man who has stepped into an Australian courtroom in the last twenty years will agree with me and still hold a grudge about his treatment. The reason Joe Public doesn’t know there’s discrimination or this dangerous abuse of power is because our media is far more adept at concealing it than theirs. 

AUSTRALIAN COURTS PUNISH ONE MAN FOR EXPOSING THEIR CORRUPTION

This crash was caused by racism

WOMEN DON’T HAVE TO GO – AND STILL WIN

She can then lodge another claim, without evidence, not bother going to court, and still get the win. You go there with your photos, bank statements, paperwork, including the original lease then her doctored lease to show the court proof of her fraud – and the judge will admonish you for defending yourself against a womans allegations. Another Kilmartin Special.

A policeman who I used to call friend inspected these documents before I took them to court. He confirmed there was enough to make a strong  case against her for fraud. But the judge at Beenleigh hates white men and won’t even look at your paperwork. You’re starting to see a pattern.

Up until this point you’ve had very little to do with the police or the courts, because you’re not a crook. Just an honest working man from the suburbs. You’re surprised and disillusioned because this sort of treatment seems totally unfair. Our legal system is supposedly blind, meaning everyone is treated equally, but that’s not the reality. Other men who have been raped by our sadistic courts took far more drastic measures, but being a peaceful guy you decide write about it instead. It seems like the only constructive way to deal with your problem.

WHAT CAN BE DONE?

THE PROOF OF OBVIOUS JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT IS EVERYWHERE

The second page again, clearly set out

This is the second page, re-typed in the same format as the first. Speaker NAMED followed by the words. When it’s clear who is speaking, The judge has some explaining to do.  Buttons go to PDF so you can verify for yourself.

The first two are original court documents. The first shows a standard court transcript. It also shows the prosecution having his evidence accepted. The second shows the same transcript further along, where the format has been changed, but why? That is the section where defence evidence was NOT admitted. The third is a re-formatted version of the second with the same content, but easier to understand.

The question now is – why was the format or document structure changed starting on page 51? The Judge says Hickey’s evidence is not admissible, but she wrong. Queenslands evidence laws are below.

CHANGING COURT TRANSCRIPTS?

When you study the previous four documents, you will see that the Judge refused all Hickey’s defence evidence, stating that it was inadmissible under the evidence act. Hickey quoted the same act and shows that she is wrong. The law is clear. Hickey argues with the judge as long as he can, being mindful not to push it too far. Arguing with a judge is never good for your case. 

We can see the evidence act opposite and below – Hickey was right all along. If there was a dispute about wording, why didn’t our Judge check the law in question? There’s always a stack of books handy. Do you think she really didn’t know? A judge does not get to sit on the bench unless they know the rules of evidence.

She knew. 

So now why was the record of events altered – only in this section – to confuse the reader about who was saying what?

There is only one explanation.

The record keeping people are trying to confuse the reader, and give the courts plausible deniability. Cast doubt on who was saying what. But no matter how you dress it up, they are covering for corrupt Queensland judges. If you can think of an alternative plausible explanation, I would love to hear it.

DOES A MASTER COVER – UP

Now, what can be done about a case where the Magistrate clearly broke the law? Hickey wrote to their boss, Terry Gardiner, the one man who has the power to correct this behaviour. The letters are below and tell the same old story.

GARDINER REFUSED TO ACT – DESPITE EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION

Terry Gardiner replied, and covered for Coates. He ignored the question, clouded the issue, said nothing of substance – deliberately. If you doubt my appraisal – read the letters below. He has obviously spent a lot of time involved with law, and is a master of bullshit. Gardiner is paid half a million dollars a year – ten grand a week, to maintain professional standards in our magistracy – yet he does nothing.

Terry Gardiner, along with Suzette Coates, and other judges named below need to go to jail. They knew exactly what they were doing and conciously chose to pervert the course of justice. Nobody is above the law. If we ignore the rules in our chosen profession – and someone is hurt – it carries jail time. These people will send us to prison with some pompous statement about deterrence and community expectations. Those same expectations apply to them. Even more so when you’re on the public dime.

WHY ALTER RECORDS IF THEY HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE?

WHY NOT JUST DO THE RIGHT THING?

Our Judges will conduct proceedings that are so ridiculously one sided that they have to change the official record of proceedings to avoid evidence of their misconduct being made public. This tampering of transcripts is easiest thing in the world to prove. Take the written record they supplied, and compare it to the audio recording. It would take only minutes to confirm. Except they won’t release the audio – so nobody can prove what happened. We just have to take their word for what was said.

Ask yourself this – if the record was accurate – then why NOT release the audio?

There’a a very simple answer – someone is lying.

At this point things start to escalate. You can prove every claim you’ve made. Surely someone in power has to listen. This is a serious issue, affecting everybody. Judges cannot be allowed to alter official records to assist the prosecution.  A golfer can’t go in and deduct a few strokes off his score, or it ruins the game.

But this here is no game. It’s a multi-billion dollar extortion racket and you are their cash cow

You try to resolve it through all the proper channels, but everything you say falls on deaf ears. It’s now clear that almost every public official is either involved, or willing to cover for those who are. Not one of them will give you a straight answer. But now the war has begun .

Police comb through your history and the best they can do is one lousy laser pointer from more than five years ago. So they put you on trial. John (police informer) Ide, a lawyer in Beenleigh, after being paid for advice on defence, then calls the prosecution and tells them everything about your planned legal strategy. Be warned, this is how the Australian legal system operates. They are all on the same team.

TRIAL IS A TOTAL CIRCUS

On trial day, you fly solo. If you’re going to blow the case, may as well do it for free. The circus starts out in the usual fashion. One of three prosecution laywers stands up and tells the court (with a straight face) that ‘there is no physical evidence, because the state destroyed it all before trial. Laser pointers and pepper spray were too dangerous to store for long periods’. When I burst out laughing, Magistrate ‘three extra spare tyres’ Morgan snapped at me to shut up. She covers for his feeble lies, later on coached the witness and then and convicts you despite what the law requires.

STATE DESTROYS EVIDENCE – COACHES WITNESSES – WON’T RELEASE TRIAL RECORDS

AND STILL CONSIDERS ITSELF A LEGITIMATE COURT OF LAW

You appeal her decision. The appeal requires that you provide a written record of the original hearing, except the Judge refused to give you one. Bradford-Morgan knows once it goes public, her career will be finished. Your applications under freedom of information are refused. You appeal those decisions and get stonewalled by bureaucrats. The organised cover up is incredible. Nothing for months, and then two days before your deadline you get an incomplete typed transcript, missing all the parts that work in your favour. You complain and ask for the audio, but that will not be released on the orders of ‘three tyres’ Morgan. This next bit is important so lets go over it again.

NEXT PART

NEXT PART

MORE WHERE THAT CAME FROM