UNFAIR DISMISSAL – JORDAN LAMACQ
Much has been written about an unfair dismissal claim made by a former employee of Smerff Electrical, one Jordan Lamacq. If you google ‘Smerff Electrical’ or ‘Unfair Dismissal’ in Australia one or more of these results will come up on more than a dozen news outlets. Why would such a trivial event get covered by so many sources? Why would it appear so frequently across the web? Australia’s Fair Work Commission (FWC) handles an average of 16,000+ cases annually, yet the other 15,999 don’t seem to rate a mention.
Australia’s media is fixated on this one claim against Smerff Electrical. Why is that?Â
Because they have a burning, insatiable hatred for Simon Hickey.
So what does all that have to do with unfair dismissal? To answer that, we must first look at the claim Jordan Lamacq made against Simon Hickey and Smerff Electrical. Anyone who views the evidence, hears Lamacq’s own admissions and understands Australian law will see almost immediately that Hickey had good grounds to fire Lamacq. Common sense, logic and reason all support the decision to terminate his employment.. There’s no way he should have won this case.
The Fair Work Commission’s own rules relating to employee miscoduct state that
Fair Work Regulation 1.07 defines Serious misconduct as:Â conduct that is wilful or deliberate and that is inconsistent with the continuation of the employment contract.[12] It is also conduct that causes serious and imminent risk to the health and safety of a person or to the reputation, viability or profitability of the employer’s business.[13]
Serious misconduct includes theft, fraud, assault, sexual harassment, intoxication at work and the refusal to carry out lawful and reasonable instructions consistent with the employment contract.[14]
So the question now is : Did Jordan Lamacq engage in serious misconduct? That depends on your definition of misconduct. Let’s imagine that serious misconduct means dangerous or illegal activity in the workplace. Is there any evidence that Lamacq engaged in this behaviour?
JORDAN LAMACQ ADMITS TO UNLICENSED ELECTRICAL WORK
Will the recorded admissions made by Lamacq himself satisfy your curiosity? Here are two recorded exchanges between the Judge and Lamacq at the hearing, where he refers to these jobs as ‘cashies’. Bare in mind that Jordan Lamacq does not have an electrical license, so any work he undertakes without supervision is by definition – unlicensed electrical work. Lamacq claims that ‘Hickey allowed them to do cashies whenever they liked’ Judge Asbury clearly didn’t buy this rubbish and it’s obvious to all listeners.
Opposite here is the official Queensland government policy relating to unlicensed electrical work. You will note that they refer to it as ‘extremely dangerous and illegal’ Not only did Jordan Lamacq admit to doing this ‘extremely dangerous and illegal’ activity, but he was keeping the money from such jobs as well. (Otherwise known as theft)
This alone is grounds for immediate termination of his employment.
Jordan Lamacq was caught doing cashies, and when Hickey demanded to know the extent of the unlicensed work that had been done, Lamacq refused to give him that information. He was given the choice, reveal all or be fired. Jordan Lamacq then quit before he could be fired, to hide the extent of his theft.
Lamacq’s argument that ‘Hickey gave him permission to do cashies whenever he liked is nonsense. Not even the Pope can give Lamacq permission to do unlicensed electrical work because it is against the law. Does it sound logical that a business owner would tell a first year apprentice ‘Here have my van and tools. Go do whatever work you want and just keep the money?
Small business cannot keep these people employed or the company goes under.Â
LAMACQ TAKES THE 5TH
LAMACQ REFUSES TO GIVE UP THE LOCATION OF HIS CASHY TO PREVENT US LEARNING THE EXTENT OF HIS THEFT
At the hearing, Asbury repeatedly asked Lamacq for the address of his job so it could be inspected for electrical safety, Lamacq refused to give her – or Hickey an answer. At this point, you would think that Jordan Lamacq, having just admitted in court that he had used my van and materials to do unlicensed electrical work – and keep the money – would have his case thrown out and be charged with several criminal offences. What he did was against the law. The state government website above says exactly that.
HOW CAN THE FWC FIND AGAINST HICKEY NOW?
HOW CAN THE FAIR WORK DECISION GO AGAINST HICKEY FROM HERE?
It can’t. Unless Hickey roundhouse kicks Asbury out of her chair. Lamacq has admitted serious misconduct with his unlicensed work. He has (indirectly) admitted theft with his claims that Hickey allowed him to do cashies whenever he liked using company equipment. Clearly Asbury did not accept that story. The only rational alternative is that Hickey did not allow cashies, but Lamacq did them anyway.
So why was Lamacq awarded $11,000+ for unfair dismissal? The decision is patently absurd.Â
Why was the story given the national media attention we looked at in the first paragraph?
Why was the decision delayed for nearly seven months and released on the exact same day Hickey’s home is raided for the fourth time by Queensland police?
The answers to all these questions are the same so let’s establish the motivation for such an obvious injustice.
HE WHO HAS THE GOLD MAKES THE RULES
The insane level of media coverage this thing got should be your first hint. You must understand that the same Jews who own all of Australia’s media – own our legal system too. Australian judges work for Israel first, Australia second and do exactly what they are told to do. Even they don’t want to get on the wrong side of big media. The vast majority of our judges are Jewish.Those who aren’t still take orders from organized Jewry. This FWC hearing is a glaring example of them using the legal process to attack their perceived enemies. If you listen to Judge Asbury’s exchange with Lamacq it is clear she isn’t buying his story.
So how did she go from there to finding against Hickey several months later?
HE WHO HAS THE GOLD MAKES THE RULES
She was told to give Jordan Lamacq the win, and justify it anyway she could.
How can you be so certain? It’s really very easy. All the evidence works in Hickey’s favour. Nothing Lamacq says or does at this point can overcome the fact he has admitted extremely dangerous and illegal work. Hickey had good grounds for termination – so if the decision goes against him – there must be some other agenda in play.
There’s only one group of people with the power to tell Australian judges which way their decisions should go. It’s not the Aboriginals and it’s not the Muslims. It’s not the women and it’s certainly not the Australians. There’s only one group of people who hate Simon Hickey and have this sort of power.
The Jews.
Just a few short years ago, Australia’s Jewish media took a great interest in Hickey’s activities because he drew attention to their absurd claims in the greatest swindle of all time. Their perpetual money making ‘Holocau$t’ extravaganza. Ask too many questions about this house of cards and you become public enemy number one. Australian human rights laws means nothing once you’ve crossed this line. There’s no right to liberty, privacy and the pursuit of happiness if the Jews decide you’re not worthy. Anyone who calls out their ‘Holocau$t extortion racket – instantly forfeits any civil rights he had.
WHO TOLD FAIR WORK COMMISSION WHEN TO STRIKE?
The timing of this decision is even further proof of foul play. How could Asbury sit on her verdict for more than six months, and then release it publicly on the same day that Hickey’s home was being raided across town by armed police. Somebody had to have known something ahead of time. There are no co-incidences in life. The incredibly bad timing makes it almost impossible for Hickey to lodge an appeal. The time limit is fourteen days, and now all his office equipment and employment records have been stolen. His first priority is to keep the business running and it’s obvious he has more important things to attend to.
During this time the avalanche of media attention begins again, and Hickey has his hands completely full. We only need to look at the following examples to see what sort of absolute obsession and personal vendetta the media has against Simon Hickey.
BARELY CONCEALED HATRED
Surely they can find more important stories to run with? They could, but destroying Simon Hickey is now their highest priority. Strings are pulled, favours called in, calls are placed to the right people, in the right positions, and now Hickey cannot take a trick, in any court in any state of Australia. It doesn’t matter how strong his case, or how lame the accusations. The decision will go against him. Once people become aware that a certain person is not allowed to win any legal matter they start to become more bold with their allegations.Â
Who here would lodge a claim for unfair dismissal after being caught doing theft by the boss? I doubt one in a hundred would have the cheek. But reconsider that position in light of the fact you know your boss cannot win a court case. Is that not an invitation to easy money? Jordan Lamacq is nothing more than an opportunistic thief, taking advantage of the fact there is a war going on between his former boss and the media. The relentless attacks on Simon Hickey are a prime example of what happens to a man who dares speak the forbidden truth.
THE AUSTRALIAN MEDIA DESTROY HIS CAREER, FAMILY AND REPUTATION
THE JEWISH MEDIA DESTROY HIS CAREER
FAIR WORK SAYS STEALING FROM NAZI’S IS JUST FINE BY US
None of this makes any sense until you understand Jewish hatred for any man who casts doubt on their Holoca$t lies. It is this one myth that earns them billions of dollars each year in ‘reparations’ and shields them from all criticism. Once you understand the depths of this hatred, it’s obvious that these people have spent the last thousand years persecuting everybody who displeases them, starting with Jesus Christ.
They are the masters of deceit. They convinced everybody that they are eternal victims, when the truth is the complete opposite.
It’s not the Jews who are persecuted. It’s them doing the persecution.
Hickey is not the first or the last to have his life destroyed for simply speaking the truth. The price has been high, but there is no other path he could have taken. Historians of the future may consider these events a fascinating insight into human behaviour of the 21st century. By then it will be obvious that : there were so many Australians taken in by the Jewish ‘holocau$t’ propaganda that they were willing to go along with underhanded revenge plots against their own people, just to curry favour with those in charge.
Ultimately, powerful Jews would never get away with these sorts of extortion and intimidation tactics were it not for the support of an entire generation of brainwashed boomers. I have come to the conclusion that it is these spineless degenerates (usually employed in our public sector) who will falsely denounce an honest working man they have never met – for some vague promise of a better salary or future career advancement – who are most worthy of contempt.
Those in ‘in charge’ of the FWC are but the latest examples.
WHAT YOU HAVE READ HERE IS BUT THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG
MORE WHERE THAT CAME FROM