HOW MUCH CAN ONE MAN TAKE?
PART 4 OF THE SAGA
IF YOU HAVEN’T READ PARTS ONE or TWO or THREE THEN BEST DO SO BEFORE STARTING HERE
The Story so far… Simon Hickey has attempted to expose serious, ongoing, organised corruption in Queenslands legal system. In the last section pf part 2, Hickey is taken before the Queensland Supreme Court and given nine months jail for making these public allegations of corruption. During the hearing Hickey stood his ground and said the court could investigate any one of his claims to verify its accuracy. Judge James Douglas, refuses to examine any of Hickey’s claims, and instead orders he spend nine months in prison. The end of that time is approaching.
NOW WE KNOW WHY GETT WAS PROMOTED
Your first prison term is traumatic, so very slow, boring and repetitive. Nine months seem like years, but the end finally draws near. You can hear your little girls squeals as she rushed into your arms, and start making plans to resume a life. Then, just days before your release, the police charge you with an offence from almost three years ago. What? How…? Why wasn’t this dealt with while you’re in here, so that you could move on with your life? Despair begins to set in as you realise that their objective is not reform or justice or community protection. This is a calculated war of attrition.
The Queensland Governments corrupt cabal of Criminal Jewish Judges against one political dissident, and you can never be free of their system.Â
At the new Kangaroo court hearing, you’re accused of saying something allegedly offensive.
Two years ago
In your own home.
To your own friend.
In a private conversation, between consenting adults.
Magistrate Anthony Gett jails you for this offence. And earns a promotion by doing so.
Magistrate Anthony Gett keeps a straight face as the charges are read out. Prosecutors pretend this is serious. Bail is refused because Gett says there’s a ‘risk of re-offending’. This means you can’t go home. You’re staying in prison. Anthony Gett, our magnificent overlord, champion of diversity, law school graduate, critical thinker and Queensland Magistrate thinks the risk that you might possibly say something else, in your own home, to another consenting adult, that may be considered offensive – is so great that you must stay in prison.
THE ONLY PERSON IN THIS COURT WHO BELONGS IN PRISON – IS MAGISTRATE ANTHONY GETT
EVENTUALLY SOMETHING WILL HAVE TO GO YOUR WAY
JUST WHEN ALL SEEMS LOST
Back in maximum security, the good lord smiles upon thee. A qualified barrister is doing time and shows you how to run your own Supreme Court bail. This court regularly frees people accused of rape, murder, and robbery, because their trial hasn’t been heard. If consistency counts for anything, they have to let you go. Another two months and our new judge grants bail, but wear a GPS, report to the cops, live where he tells you and a dozen other conditions, but now you’re ‘free to go’.
When you’re released after serving twelve of nine months, you chase up the transcript of your sentencing to keep as a record. When it arrives, a great big ‘REVISED’ is stamped across it. And substantial parts were missing from its content. Despite fatigue and apprehension, you contact Auscript and question the omissions.Â
WE’VE BEEN CHANGING TRANSCRIPTS ALL ALONG. BUT IT’S OK SEE
The email comes back without a hint of shame. ‘Judges can sometimes make minor alterations to the transcript before it’s released. That’s why there’s parts missing, and a stamp across the page. This woman has no idea that you just served a year in prison for alleging the judiciary is altering court records, and she openly admits that they do so. She may not have been authorised to tell us what she did, but we have it now in writing. The only sections missing of course, are the ones that worked in your favour.
They took your business, house, family, friends, everything you owned because your allegations ‘brought the courts into disrepute’ and now they have admitted in writing that you were right all along. This admission from the court means nothing, its not like you’re getting that time back. As weeks turn to months, Terry Morgan, your barrister, does nothing but work with the prosecution to drag out this new. trial. He knows living like this is stressful for anyone, but defending clients is not what he does, despite appearances.Â
SURPRISE !       IT’S TRIAL DAY
Eight months after your release, the trial is announced with only two days notice. The state has known all along when to move, but by surprising the defence, they limit your time to prepare. The four witnesses who will testify on your behalf must drop everything and make arrangments to give evidence, disrupting their own life for no reward. Just hours before kick off, your lawyers, try to convince you that your witnesses aren’t necessary. Just leave them out of it.
Jarrod Bell and Emily Lewsey are supposed to be defending you. This is a trial where the key aspect is whether or not the accused conduct was offensive. Every person involved will give evidence that they weren’t offended and your lawyers say it’s a bad idea to bring them?
Imagine you’re on trial for rape, and the woman in question is happy to tell the court she wasn’t raped, that she willingly had sex. Is that not the best defence of all?Â
BARNEY GUMBLE WOULD HAVE DONE A BETTER JOB AS PROSECUTOR
So how could this witness evidence possibly harm your case? It can’t. Any witness giving that evidence will win the case there and then. Nothing else is required. Jarrod Bell and Emily Lewsey, have tried to coerce you into giving away the entire ballgame. Your own defence team is working with the courts to convict you. There is no other explanation.
These two put the pressure on, but ultimately fail. Common sense dictates that you and your friends will give evidence.
After paying this law firm more than $20,000 to defend you, it’s obvious whose team they are on. It’s now you vs the court, the judge, the prosecutor and your own defence team. If you don’t get a good jury, you’re fucked.
ONLY THE USUAL
Queensland District Court met all kangaroo expectations, a theatre production would be more accurate. Marc Dunn, who calls himself a ‘police officer’ bursts into tears while viewing the evidence. This was his way of convincing Jurors that the material was so incredibly scary that it crushed his delicate heart. His performance is an insult to the men and women who deal with really traumatic events, like fatal car crashes and industrial accidents. If those people don’t bawl on the witness stand then what sort of faggot is Marc Dunn?
THEIR BEST IS ON THE CASE
The goofy looking prosecutor, Daniel Whitmore has no respect for the law, despite his sworn oath to uphold it. He wants to win at all costs, and there’s nothing he won’t do to achieve it. It was him and Fantin who convinced your own lawyers to throw the case before it began, by keeping our witnesses out. When that failed he whined to the judge that ‘if his defence witnesses give evidence then my case will be effectively shot’. Someone should remind him – if that’s the case, and you knew about these people – why the fuck did you bring charges at all?Â
Whitmores lack of integrity was only surpassed by his lack of charisma. He stuttered, and stopped, spoke so quetly that only a few could hear. When Whitmore was floundering our ‘impartial’ judge, would suggest ways to start his next line of questions. She tried to help the prosecution at every step of the way. At one point she suggested the jury might need conselling for their allegedly traumatic experience.
When you watched Hostel, or Freddy Krueger, did you require any counselling?
JUDGE TRACY FANTIN ATTEMPTING TO FIX THE TRIAL
Horror movies are far more graphic and violent than the Christchurch video which contained almost no blood, and no close up scenes. Our judge was deliberately attempting to dramatise the events. If she thought counselling might be required, then why not wait until after the verdict? Let the jury decide if they need counselling.
IN QUEENSLAND COURTS
LAWS ARE NOT ALLOWED
By the time defence gets to speak, its early on the third day. The judge Tracy Fantin informs us that the state (article 21) and federal (HRC 1986) law regarding freedom of speech is not relevant to this case. It cannot be read to the jury. Let that sink in for just a moment.
This is what happened.
Judge Tracy Fantin declares that you cannot quote the law, in your own defence.
You are in Queensland District Court. A court of law, and you cannot read the law which protects your conduct.
QUEENSLAND LAWS DO NOT APPLY IN THIS QUEENSLAND COURT – JUDGE FANTIN
On the left is the Queensland District Court, otherwise known as a court of law.
On the right is Queensland Human rights law, which is used in courts.
But in this case, Queensland law cannot be used in a Queensland court to defend an accused man.
ONLY JUDGES CAN DECIDE WHAT WORDS REALLY MEAN
They’re the only ones who know the real meaning of words in our English language.It’s a unique skill only taught to Judges, and politicians. They use it to determine what a law or phrase actually means. For example. The term ‘everybody has the right to freedom of expression’ is actually a bit misleading. What this law really says is that ‘everyone except you‘ has that right.
You’re lucky you have such a learned woman there to guide you, or this state and federal law might be misunderstood. Politicians are generally more skilled than judges in this area. They can redefine words and phrases more than a dozen times a day if they have to, and the rest of us just have to accept the new and improved meaning. We’re only taxpayers, and these people know whats best for us.
YOUR WITNESSES ARE DELAYED, POSTPONED, AND FUCKED AROUND TO TRY MAKE THEM QUIT
Your witnesses aren’t required again today, they will have to come back tomorrow. This is the third day they have taken off work. State witnesses weren’t kept waiting like this, only the defence. On the fourth day Fantin drags out proceedings again, just enough to waste the day. ‘Oh I am really sorry’ she says with a smirk ‘Your witnesses can’t do their bit today either’Â They should be able to give their evidence tomorrow, but who knows?
What you’re seeing here, is a judges attempts to keep the best witnesses from giving evidence at your trial. People can’t just keep taking days off work, for no money, and Tracy (fix-the-trial) Fantin knows it. First your own lawyers try to keep them away, now the judge is doing her best. They know that once these people speak to the jury, it’s game over. There’s been quite a bit of behind the scenes planning gone into this.
Everybody is suprised when my guys show up the next day, except me. My friends and I have been through a lot, and their loyalty, while appreciated, is not surprising in the least. I would do the same for them and they know it. I’d come a hundred days if I had to.
JUDGES HAVE THE POWER
TO RE-DEFINE OUR WORDS
It’s a unique skill only taught to Judges, and politicians. They use it to determine what a law actually means. For example. The term ‘everybody has the right to freedom of expression’ is actually a bit misleading. What the law here actually says is that ‘everyone except you‘ has that right.
You’re lucky you have such a learned woman there to guide you, or that sentence might be misunderstood. Politicians are generally more skilled than judges in this area. They can redefine words and phrases more than a dozen times a day if they have to, and the rest of us just have to accept the new and improved meaning each time. It can get confusing, but we’re only taxpayers, so they know whats best for us.
YOUR WITNESSES ARE DELAYED INTENTIONALLY AGAIN – IN THE HOPE THEY’LL STOP COMING
Then you’re told that your witnesses aren’t required today, they will have to come back tomorrow when the court is ready. This is the third day they have taken off work to give their evidence. State witnesses weren’t kept waiting like this, only the defence ones. On the fourth day Fantin drags out proceedings again, just enough to waste the day. ‘Oh I am really sorry’ she says with a smirk ‘Your witnesses can’t do their bit today either’Â They should be able to give their evidence tomorrow, but who knows?
What you’re seeing here, is a judges attempts to keep the best witnesses from giving evidence at your trial. People can’t just keep taking days off work, for no money, and Fantin knows it. First your own lawyers try and keep them away, now the judge is doing her best. They know that once these people speak to the jury, it’s game over. JUst another example of how the state will fix a trial.
Everybody is suprised when my guys show up the next day, except me. My friends and I have been through a lot, and their loyalty while appreciated, is not surprising in the least. I would do the same for them and they know it.
YOUR WITNESS STILL PERSISTS IN TURNING UP?    WE’LL JUST BAN HIM FROM TALKING
YOUR WITNESS STILL WON’T GO AWAY?  FINE
HE CANNOT SPEAK IN YOUR DEFENCE
First we’re told we can’t quote the law. Then after the judges constant delays failed to make your witnesses go away, we are told that they cannot answer our questions. Fantin knows once my guys speak, it’s all over for the state. That’s why she stopped them. Funny, I don’t remember any restrictions on what prosecution witnesses could say, but this is Queensland, and fixing trials ocurrs every day.
The main point of contention here – is whether the accused’s conduct was offensive.Â
When Hickey was first charged with ‘using a carriage service to offend’ the police alleged people were offended. The judge accepted the police version and jailed Hickey before a trial. The document right, is one of the defence documents presented to the court. It is written by the person police allege was olffended. Signed, witnessed and official. This document was deemed ‘irrelevant’ and therefore inadmissible by Judge Tracy Fantin.
Are you paying attention?
Your freedom is at stake.
There are no rules of evidence.
There are no laws.
There is no justice.
Our courts do whatever the fuck they want.
Out of malice, greed or pure spite.
You need to face reality. These people hate white men and want us dead.
When Hickey was first charged with ‘using a carriage service to offend’ the police alleged that several people were offended. They presented unsigned documents to the court in the form of a QP9 which the judge used to jail Hickey.The image above, is one of the defence documents ruled ‘irrelevant and therefore inadmissible’ by Judge Tracy Fantin.
Are you paying attention?
Your freedom is at stake.
There are no rules of evidence.
There are no laws.
There is no justice.
Our courts do whatever the fuck they want out of pure spite.
These people hate you and want you dead. Face reality.
HICKEY BEATS THEM ALL – SOLO
After eight long days in court, costing the taxpayer a million dollars plus, the jury cannot reach a verdict. It means you’re not guilty. Despite the prosecutor, judge, defence lawers and media all gunning to convict, the jury could see you were being railroaded. At least some of them stood firm and set you free.
Tracy Fantin had been thwarted in her attempts to fix the trial, but she’d make up for it with bail conditions that would make your life hell. The curfew, reporting, ankle tag and phone restrictions. You must remain living in the site shed surrounded by mud in an industrial lot behind a swamp. You can’t move, see your family, leave the state, use private apps on your phone or spend a week without reporting. They will drag this on another eight months and by then you should be ready to plead guilty.
NOW YOU’VE REALLY PISSED THEM OFF
The collective Queensland Judiciary – who orchestrated this series of events, using taxpayer funds to crush you under the weight of legal problems that they created – are seething with rage. One white man with a sharp mind, a perceptive gaze and sixth sense about treachery has beaten them all.
The state lost despite owning all the lawyers, judges, buildings, and lawbooks. Even when Hickey’s own defence lawyer was feeding them intel and working against his own client to convict, Simon won.Â
HIS OWN LAWYER WAS TRYING TO THROW THE TRIAL BUT HICKEY PICKED IT FROM THE START
EVEN HIS OWN LAWYER WAS IN ON THE FIX
Jarrods Bells ‘professional’ advice in this case was not to bring my witnesses – to say they were not offended. And not to give evidence myself, because he knew it could be easily won. It was too late to fire his ass, so I ignored the backstabbing rat and did both. After sitting silent for days and listening to inferior men speak ill of my character, I finally got my turn. Standing to address the jury – I looked them in the eye and said. ‘I did nothing wrong. I have a clear conscience. A private conversation between consenting adults is just that. If you want to convict me go ahead, but you are opening the way for them to charge any person at any time with any bullshit they want to. I would not convict you if the roles were reversed’.Â
In less than a minute – with two sentences Hickey wiped away the previous four days of bullshit. I won the case there and then. Tracy Fantin visibly slumped in her chair. Fuck you Jarrod Bell and Emily Lewsey. What you did is called fraud. You accepted money to defend me, then did your best to convict.Â
Hickey should have kept the twenty thousand dollars he paid those two criminals Jarrod Bell and Emily Lewsey. Hickey’s natural honesty and confidence made him a far better public speaker than either of these two shifty lawyers. That was the moment jurors made up their minds. When the verdict came back and the state failed he should have been set free. Instead they decide on a re-trial, because it’s only taxpayers money. Hickey’s bail conditions are worse. Fantin decides to tighten the screws.
MORE WHERE THAT CAME FROM