DAVID FREARSON SC

DAVID FREARSON

We have already obtained vast amounts of information from other spineless bureaucrats who came before you, we need your version only to verify what we already know. To see if you are telling us the truth and perhaps give us something others have missed.

As a senior member of the new cabinet, I will be the one to decide whether or not to reduce your brick by a month. Maybe three. You will be doing a brick, bare minimum, so get used to the idea. You may or may not remember me, so I will take this opportunity to refresh your memory. Name is Simon Hickey, I was serving prison in NSW for (ostensibly) manufacturing one (1) portable tyre deflation device, and possession of a fake ID.

Of interest here is that

• no tyres were actually deflated and;
• This device is so dangerous that it is not illegal in any other state of Australia
• Fake ID is not illegal unless it is used to deceive

If a person spends all his time in other Australian states with something that is not against the law, then inadvertently breaks a NSW law, unaware that the device he has made is illegal in that state, then he is entitled to leniency. In fact, leniency is almost enforceable, because the countries laws should be uniform.

DAVID FREARSON OBTAINED BULK SHEKELS BY BEING SHABBOS GOY

Do I need to remind you that In Australia, a country governed by the rule of law, the sentence imposed must be just and appropriate in the light of the overall offending behaviour: the principle of totality.

I was convicted of manufacturing one tyre deflation device. Just one. Yet you decided that 18 months in prison for this offence was not enough. You effectively doubled it.

We both know that’s not why I was in prison. That offence is simply not deserving of prison time, not in anyone’s eyes. That is, anyone except Rabbi Dunlevy, and David Frearson SC.

But that’s not the only interesting thing about my case. On sentencing, Rabbi Dunlevy decided to insert some random and unfounded remarks about ‘domestic terrorist’. At the time I was surprised. WTF? There’s no reference to terrorism here, no mention of anything political, and no victims. Where did he get that? It wasn’t until later that it all made sense.

Even back then the fix was in.

The NSW authorities wanted a ‘right-wing-extremist’ to add to their list of terrorism subjects. Someone told Dunlevy to use those terms – two years prior to the THRO application. So how could a magistrate know two years before it happened? Unless that application was planned well in advance?

Which then begs: How can Australian authorities explain their actions in ‘planning to declare someone a terrorist’ before he has done anything of the sort? This whole episode raises a lot of questions that you will help us answer. That is, if you ever want to get out of prison.

Going back to 2021, we should look at the sentence of three years in prison. Then compare that to the official NSW sentencing bench book. When one takes into account that no person was hurt, no property was damaged, there was no dishonesty, no losses were incurred by anybody, and this it was my first offence in NSW. Any jail term is absolutely unwarranted.

When you compare my sentence to others handed down by the same Jewish extremist Dunlevy in other cases, questions must be asked. Why does Dunlevy think that distribution of child pornography is worth no jail time? He doesn’t jail aboriginals who smash up their government funded house, hold their wives head in the toilet, then assault the rest of his family while drunk, so how is mine any more serious than that? It clearly is not. Not in anyone’s language. Unless that language is Hebrew.

Dunlevy considers islanders who have never held a job, who steal a dozen cars in a crime spree leading into the Northern Territory a better rehabilitation prospect than he does me. When it is understood that I have always worked full time and have a family, it is obvious that a three-year prison term for this offence is malicious, disproportionate, and unwarranted. Whatever happened to : all accused persons must be judged by a person who is unbiased and impartial. I would assume that you are aware of this aspect of the law. Even though you ignore it.

By the time you got my case the sentence had been reduced to 18 months (lucky me) by a District Court Judge name McClellan. Of interest here is that when a lawyer I spoke to about the SPA appeal heard of my success in getting the sentence reduced he said ‘I heard you got up in your appeal. You must have done alright because McClellan hates you’ Those were his exact words.

What’s curious now is that I had never met McClellan, never seen him, never set foot in his court before that day, so how could he hate me? This lawyer’s faux pa proved what we already knew. McClellan doesn’t think the laws about impartiality apply to himself either. Add his name to the list. That’s two from two in NSW so far, but then there’s the Frearson matter.

The psychological warfare that the Australian government conducts against its own citizens is really something to behold. It must take a lot of people working behind the scenes to cook up these charades, consider the timing and the effects, then implement the plan so it all goes off with the precision I have personally witnessed. Their dedication to a socialist utopia should be commended, even though it can never be realised.

It was less than 48 hours until my release when I was told that I wouldn’t be going home to see my family. After spending nearly a year in prison with actual criminals I was deemed ‘Too dangerous to be released on parole’. The offender ‘may engage in terrorist activity’ was written as the reason.

A more savage blow I have never been dealt. The misery inflicted on me by this move was intentional, malicious, well timed and contrived by a sinister group of radical activists employed by our government. We now know most of their names. These people are very good at their jobs. It’s just a pity their job description is: cause their fellow citizens as much pain, misery and disruption as possible’.

I sometimes wonder about their motivations. Are they simply misguided communist fools who adopted their far-left extremism in university, drilled into them by Jewish academics? So protective and defensive of their worldview that anybody who exposes it as a lie becomes a pathological obsession?
Or are they sadistic losers who achieve nothing in their own lives, so to compensate, they spend their time bringing successful people down, as a way to hide their own inadequacies?

I suspect a bit of both. You’re included there Frearson

What is it about truth and common-sense you people find so abhorrent? A more pertinent question might be – how can such intelligent people dedicate their lives to this Marxist rubbish, knowing they can never debate the finer aspects of it in public because they will be laughed out of town. You’re included here again.

I could ask 100,000 rational Australian adults whether a person with no history of violence or terrorism is a risk to the community because he is racist, and the answer would invariably come back: what drugs am I on? Of course not.

You think you know better than all other adults combined Frearson so we might ask what drugs are you on? Or more accurately, you are cognitively aware that our positions are the correct ones. We stand in truth and you in falsehood. You consider racism evil because it is the truth. You will never be able to demonstrate equality or the benefits of diversity because there are none. Your only way of dealing with those who speak the truth is to silence them using your ‘legal’ system as a weapon.

Now it’s your turn to be on the receiving end.

I have been able to locate similar cases of parole decision review which came before you, and saved them for your sentencing. I will omit all but the most obvious here. The case of DAVIS, in 2020. You remember Davis? The serial rapist who employed ruthless violence in all his offences. He re-offended dozens of times, spent most of his adult life in prison, attacked children, the elderly, complete strangers if the opportunity presented itself. Yet you saw fit to overturn his parole decision and free Davis. He was released on your order.

Yet in my case, a man with no history of violence whatsoever, no dishonesty, no sexual assaults and absolutely no terrorism – you ruled that the risk to the community was too great. But in the ‘office use only’ section you wrote RACIST and closed the file.

The only question now Mr Frearson is: Mainstream or protection?

You swore to uphold the principals of our legal system. You then broke your oath in a most deliberate way. There can only be one punishment for that. Full time imprisonment. The Australian public are entitled to a fair, transparent, and balanced legal system where the punishment reflects the crime. We are also entitled to imprison any former member of the judicial process who abused his position of power to achieve political objectives.

I would like you to consider coming clean now and giving us the names of people who gave you directions, suggestions or orders when dealing with myself, and other political activists who came before you. Any co-operation with our investigation will go in your favour when it comes sentence time.

The offer will not be repeated.

Simon Hickey

MORE WHERE THAT CAME FROM